Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 4901 - 4920 of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2017, 8:46 am
  Subsequently, in 2010, the Maryland State Collection Agency Licensing Board held that companies like Defendant are debt collectors and must be licensed to operate in Maryland. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Justice Hoffstadt begins today's opinion by saying the following:"Earlier this year, one of our sister courts in People v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 2:33 pm
"And I don't particularly like how I think that process ends. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 3:31 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
Despite the Supreme Court’s repeated exhortation that courts should not “improperly second-guess” the executive’s parole decisions, Biden, 597 U.S. at 816 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring); Harisiades v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 5:38 am by Kevin
        Related StoriesUpdate: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for SaleUnited States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish MeatCourt: No Tigers in Malibu  [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:50 am by Tom Crane
Wal-Mart case will likely become several state and region class action lawsuits. [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am by Eric Goldman
The defendant is the Bye, Goff firm, based in River Falls, Wisconsin with other in-state offices. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:20 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1975, the Supreme Court in O’Connor v Donaldson held that it was unconstitutional for a state to continue to confine a harmless, mentally ill person. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 5:19 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  This is a Louisiana state court case, so the cert. petition could test the extent to which the Justices believe that any of the principles (or, more likely, the leanings) announced in Wal-Mart may impact state-court class-action proceedings. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:43 am by Amanda Frost
 But Vázquez and Vladeck conclude that if Congress were to abolish the lower federal courts, the state courts would be authorized — indeed, constitutionally obligated — to grant habeas relief to federal prisoners as well, at least on claims like the one at issue in Montgomery. [read post]