Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 4901 - 4920 of 120,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Despite constant citation, the effect of the “death row” case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439 has been profoundly diluted by a more recent line of authorities on the jurisdictional limits of the Convention under Article 1, notably, Bankovic v Belgium and others (2007) 44 EHRR 1 and R (Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence [2007] UKHL 26: The Claimants are US citizens convicted and sentenced by US Courts in respect of… [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * AdWords Buys Using Geographic Terms Support Personal Jurisdiction–Rilley v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Just one instance of using the N-word epithet towards an African American coworker may be severe enough to be unlawful racial harassment in violation of the FEHA (Bailey v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:41 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
In May 2023 a New Jersey US Appellate Division refused to exclude insurers from coverage under an all-risks property insurance policy because the cyberattack which infected and damaged thousands of the claimant’s computers in its global network did not amount to “hostile/warlike action”. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 9:54 am
Seattle School District (05-908) and Meredith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
The IPKat has now had some time to put its razor-sharp fangs into the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s decision in C-371/18 Sky v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:10 pm by Alfred Brophy
The University of Idaho College of Law’s 2018 Idaho Law Review symposium issue will study the impact of Terry v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:26 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
Toys ‘R’ Us’ an employer may be liable if the sexual harasser was acting within the scope of his or her employment or if the employer was negligent for allowing the existence of a hostile work environment. [read post]