Search for: "Mark May"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 63,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 1:53 am
Taking our musical instruments example again, a CTM owner who only sells trombones under the mark may keep “musical instruments” or “brass instruments”, but is unlikely to keep a specified list that includes violins, clarinets or tubas. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 2:11 am
“Congrats: you may have just deal-broken your client out of a federal antitrust investigation and prosecution. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:38 am
What is "inherently distinctive" in this regard may not always be capable of a neat definition. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:49 pm
While the Court may not have been aware of the recent District Court decision in My Choice Software, LLC. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:30 am
This decade may mark one of the most significant shifts in popular thinking about criminal justice issues. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:27 am
The strategy begins with an offensive action against a trade mark. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:20 am
But he cautioned that VaR assumes certain historical correlations, which may be inapplicable during times of extreme stress. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
It may be going too far to describe it as zen-like but it is certainly a clever little trade mark! [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 3:55 pm
by Mark R. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:18 am
At the Law Offices of Mark A. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:18 am
At the Law Offices of Mark A. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 pm
It contended that "employers who may be required by law to provide protective eyewear ... would be presumed to exercise a higher degree of care in their purchase than would ordinary consumers. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 10:45 pm
As to appearance:Although the interior letters "CH" and "L" are different, these differences are not likely to be noticed by consumers who may purchase razor blades, an inexpensive item, without great care, and who, because of their familiarity with the famous SCHICK mark, are likely to "misread" SLICK in a quick glance at the mark. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:15 am
May 13 marks 50 years since the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:15 am
May 13 marks 50 years since the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
In keeping with my urge to mess with the basic format, it's on two articles: Frederick Mark Gedicks's forthcoming article 'Substantial' Burdens: How Courts May (and Why They Must) Judge Burdens on Religion Under RFRA, and Michael Helfand's Identifying Substantial Burdens. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
A reading list: Mark P. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:53 am
Registration is awaiting proof from Facebook that it actually has used the mark in commerce. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 1:03 pm
It also provides that “any person” may sue for that fine, splitting any recovery with the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:39 am
Greenerside Holdings, LLC, Opposition No. 91285160 (May 23, 2024) [precedential]. [read post]
