Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 4901 - 4920 of 15,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  In the landmark case of Wickard v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Yuba Power Products, some fifty years ago. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Eugene Volokh
For the view that Harisiades gives the government nearly unlimited immigration power over aliens, see Price v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 12:01 pm by Chris Hajec
There is no indication, let alone a clear indication, that the people intended to surrender any of this power when they ratified the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  Phrase at (one's) discretion attested from 1570s (earlier in (one's) discretion, late 14c.), from sense of "power to decide or judge, power of acting according to one's own judgment" (late 14c.). [read post]
12 May 2018, 3:03 am by INFORRM
  For all these reasons, this is a powerful tool in the media lawyer’s toolbox. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 5:01 am by Steven Collis
Prior to that, government, and particularly state and local governments, enjoyed tremendous power over people's lives. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
I know of only one appellate case that authorized a similar order, People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The 1981 case of New York v. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am by Rosalind English
They argued, on the basis of Cadder, that the leading of evidence of the statements they made during their police interviews was a breach of their rights under Articles 6(3)(c) and 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and that, in terms of section 57(2) of the Scotland Act 1998, the Lord Advocate had no power to lead that evidence. [read post]