Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 4901 - 4920 of 6,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The increase can be seen as a consequence of the decision in eBay v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I just ran across an excellent example that I hadn’t found when doing research on that case, State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:16 pm by gstasiewicz
" Medicare and the FDA are legally prohibited from denying approval of a medical treatment based solely on cost. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
First on this Kat’s platter for the day is the decision in Schütz v Werit [2011] EWCA Civ 303. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 2:47 am by Tobias Thienel
It recalled its case-law to the effect that it was not permissible under the Convention to shield foreign heads of State and diplomatic agents from criticism purely solely on account of their function or status (Colombani and Others v France, para 68). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:56 am by Alham Chelehmalzadeh
For further information, see Mark’s slip and fall website: www.slipfall.ca The case of Druet v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
What they fail to realize is that the costs associated with the rate are as important as the term, type of rate (e.g., fixed v. adjustable) and the loan program (e.g., FHA, conventional, jumbo). [read post]