Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 4901 - 4920 of 19,920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2017, 10:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
H.R.2284: To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and State approval of national monuments and restrictions on the use of national monuments. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 3:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
In 1934, Congress enacted the National Firearms Act, banning among other weapons sawed-off shotguns, and the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of the Act in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Errol Adams
Since the Stonewall Riots of 1969, which sparked the gay rights movement, there is much to be celebrated in the United States and more particularly in New York State. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
TRUMP, President of the United States of America, determine, pursuant to section 202 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, that the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong (Hong Kong) is no longer sufficiently autonomous to justify differential treatment in relation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China) under the particular United States laws and provisions thereof set out in this order. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
After a jury convicted Christopher Castillo “of making a threat to injure or kill the President of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:50 am by Gritsforbreakfast
  In 2004, the United States Supreme Court answered this question in the case of Hiibel v. [read post]