Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 178,400
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2021, 6:24 am
The trial judge denied plaintiff’s motion to increase the award and in Mehmeti v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:18 pm
"[W]e hold that an unaccepted offer of judgment cannot moot a named-plaintiff's claim in a putative class action": So held a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:35 am
Loral’s D&O insurer denied coverage and commenced an action seeking a judicial declaration that their policy did not cover the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fee awards. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:51 am
What is the plaintiff’s role in the litigation process? [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:16 pm
Therefore, under the Supreme Court’s rulings in Daimler and Bristol-Myers Squibb, the defendant could be subject to personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts only if the conduct forming the basis for a plaintiff’s claim occurred in Massachusetts. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:15 am
Although the court denied some of plaintiff’s requests in this regard, it granted plaintiff’s request that he be permitted to transmit the notice via social media. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:28 am
It does not appear that Judge Hamilton’s ruling deterred the plaintiffs’ bar, as Ira Rothken, a San Francisco-based lawyer who handles privacy class actions noted that he expects data breaches to grow in the future. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:42 pm
"Plaintiffs/Appellants Granted Panel Rehearing in 2257 Case": Mark Kernes of AVN News has this report. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 8:01 am
The plaintiff’s application with respect to Dr. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
Lasnik granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff’s motion to quash subpoenas for personal phone records and bank records, finding that phone records before the plaintiff’s hand injury on the defendant’s fishing boat were “of vital importance to defendants’ theory of the case”, but that the need for pre-incident bank records was not proportional to the needs of...Read the whole entry... [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
Lasnik granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff’s motion to quash subpoenas for personal phone records and bank records, finding that phone records before the plaintiff’s hand injury on the defendant’s fishing boat were “of vital importance to defendants’ theory of the case”, but that the need for pre-incident bank records was not proportional to the needs of...Read the whole entry... [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:38 pm
Continued use of the shoes have caused fall accidents, strained the wearer's muscles and placed unusually intense pressure on hip and ankle bones. [read post]
12 May 2015, 8:16 am
The defendant’s insurance policy limit had been $5 million, and plaintiffs initially only demanded $12.5 million. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:13 pm
” PSS solely acted in a consulting capacity and did not have any actual authority to control plaintiff’s work or the condition on which plaintiff was allegedly injured. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 1:13 pm
” PSS solely acted in a consulting capacity and did not have any actual authority to control plaintiff’s work or the condition on which plaintiff was allegedly injured. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:04 am
Plaintiff's renewed motion for a preliminary injunction precluding defendant "from launching in the United States its generic raloxifene product" was granted where defendant conceded infringement but contested validity and enforceability. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:29 am
The plaintiffs in Perez et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 9:15 am
An AP article discusses that these changes could benefit doctors and hospitals but they would also harm a plaintiff's ability to seek just compensation when they are involved in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:23 am
Robinson denied a plaintiff’s motion for a 90 day stay to permit it to select new counsel. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 5:10 pm
They sought attorneys’ fees and costs, but the Court of Chancery’s final order did not address that issue. [read post]
