Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2010, 1:33 pm
Colvard, Bumping Passengers—Airline Service That Just Doesn’t Fly, p.189 # Kelly Flanagan, False Claims Act—The Tenth Circuit Fails to Fully Consider the Harm to Public Policy Caused by Enforcement of a Prefiling Release Agreement in a Qui Tam Action: United States ex rel. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The agreement provides a joint commitment to the public. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:43 am
The shrimpers claim Halliburton Energy Services Inc. was responsible for capping the well.The cases are Wetzel v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
(Class 46) (The Trademark Blog) Are goods or services similar? [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
United States (08-1196) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether, to convict a state official for depriving the public of its right to the defendant’s honest services through the non-disclosure of material information, in violation of the mail-fraud statute (18 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
AnimalFeeds International and Merck & Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm
United States (both involving the “honest services” fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:59 pm
(Disclosure: We're co-counsel for respondents, along with Public Justice and the Hardy Law Firm of Reno, Nevada.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:08 am
Arizona Public Public Service Co., 803 P.2d 930 (Ariz. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Criminal record check in public school employment, volunteer service, see 18A:6-7.1. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm
Citing MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 236, traders conducting their business from the Chifley Tower building in Sydney would not have infringed the plaintiff's trade mark ("Chifley Tower") if they used that name in good faith as the name of their place of business. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
Arch Wireless Operating Co., 529 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2008); City of Ontario v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
” In re Farber, 78 N.J. 259, 270, cert. denied sub nom., New York Times Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
Beharry & Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Emine Technology Co., Ltd. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Co., 38 NY2d 445, 451-452, quoting Muschany v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Politics is also more familiar and therefore more accessible to the public than are court decisions. [read post]
