Search for: "Sees v. Sees"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 121,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Likewise, in 2022, a Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice dismissed an accounting claim based on the same grounds: failure to allege a predicate breach (see Chernomordik v Ocean Sand Dev., 2022 N.Y. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
This is the final part of this Kat’s analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
See, for example, Mitchell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
Taking the Joseph Rowntree definition of poverty, we can see that some elements may already be enshrined in the Human Rights Act and other pieces of legislation. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Kirschner v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 pm
Very glad to see substantive debates like this, this one moderated and organized by David Steele. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court allows in Utah v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
The case is called Greenberg v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm
However, we will have to wait and see when this issue inevitably reaches the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm
However, we will have to wait and see when this issue inevitably reaches the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:00 pm
And although the economic literature tends to focus on the role trade secrets play in technical innovation, the report noted that trade secrets litigation tends to concern litigation over commercial information rather than technical information (read: customer lists that former employees take with them with a Ctrl X and a Ctrl V when jumping ship). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:28 am
See Arrant v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
In Hindu American Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:04 am
" The Court noted that it had to be guided by the evidence, regardless of the motive driving such evidence, and held that on CSL’s own evidence AC Cars' use of the sign “Cobra” could not have affected the essential function of either of the Ford Cobra Marks as a guarantee of origin (see Arsenal v Reed). [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 1:05 am
The decision considered what it means for "the product" in Article 3(a) to be protected by a marketing authorisation (see also IPKat: The SPC alphabet). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
See, among others, ADA serial litigation – will the Supreme Court cut off the head of this snake? [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
