Search for: "Sides v. Beene" Results 4901 - 4920 of 25,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2015, 6:15 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Attorneys on both the defense and the plaintiffs side of the bar have amassed and shared such information on various experts, to the point that the information has become quite extensive with respect to certain experts.Now that such voluminous discovery of litigation-related activity and compensation has been gathered on certain experts, the question has become to what extent all that information can be fairly utilized to cross-examine an expert at trial.In its recent decision in… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
The objection therefore, which has been markedly displayed by both politicians and the press, is actually with Parliamentary involvement in the Article 50 invocation decision, and should not have been phrased in terms of an attack on the judicial decision. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 1:25 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division’s decision, please use this link: Matter of Watkins v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am by The Health Law Firm
Do not send a written statement explaining your side of the story.You have important constitutional rights that protect you. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 3:04 pm by David Kramer
An interesting side issue will be what happens if one of the objecting party’s alternate strikes would, if exercised, violate the Batson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:12 am
 As a result, Dish Network has been sued by all four major networks for copyright infringement, and its Chief Executive Officer Charles Ergen has been dubbed by The Hollywood Reporter as "The Most Hated Man in Hollywood." [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 3:24 am
Romito's pasta (left) v Sposito's pasta (right)Is there IP in culinary recipes? [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:08 am by Unknown
The court deemed the shares voted in favor of the amendment and declared the amendment to have been approved, subject to the plaintiff completing a stock split (Texas Pacific Land Corporation v. [read post]