Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 5,339
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 11:34 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Our bias is to believe the defendant, of course, but readers can compare the back and forth in the opinion and draw their own conclusions. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 6:25 am
In Shanks v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
" Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:30 pm
And if any bias was established it would simply go to the weight given to the testimony (see Khan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:22 pm
State Farm has since revealed that Scruggs leaked sealed court documents to the reporters. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 5:54 pm
Dzyuba was a native of Georgia, but went to the Ukraine before coming to the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
With this Panglossian universe in mind, we turn to Julian v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 5:19 am
See Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm
Wong v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:01 pm
Ceesary v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:57 pm
" US v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:06 am
Case Name: Smith v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:55 pm
Case Name: Eaton v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
Earlier this year, the United States Supreme Court decided Hall Street Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
