Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 7,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 4:20 am
(Or, as Lee Gesmer states it, “Filtration for interoperability should be performed ex ante, not ex post. [read post]
9 May 2014, 1:09 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
At the time of the USS COLE bombing and the events in question at issue in the commission, the President and Congress declared that the United States was in a state of peace—not in a state of war—in and around Yemen. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:56 am
McCrary v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:42 am
People v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am
Like the school district lines in Milliken v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
Toth v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:24 am
Relying on Florida v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am
The theory of Smith [v. [read post]
4 May 2014, 8:07 am
Using Judge Posner's reasoning in Hoctor v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:50 am
Forcellati v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:41 pm
In two early decisions, Fortnightly Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
“[O]n April 17,2014, SpaceX learned that the Air Force decided not to compete future Single Core Launch Vehicles that SpaceX is qualified to launch because the Air Force has an ‘existing 36-core contractual requirement’ with ULA,” the filing states. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
“EELV continues to be the most successful DOD acquisition program of the past few decades,” the release stated. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:58 pm
That said, it is also consistent with Daniel’s statement that other Departments outside of the Intelligence Community or DOD (such as the Commerce and State Departments) might sometimes have input in the store v. disclose decision. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:47 am
The judge refused to allow the former employee to file a second amended complaint and also declined to exercise jurisdiction over the former employee’s state law claims (Segarra v Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April 23, 2014, Abrams). [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:33 pm
The court states that 'the record reflects that negotiations have been ongoing,' [...] but, as the district court even acknowledged, Motorola asserts otherwise--that Apple for years refused to negotiate while nevertheless infringing the '898 patent [...] [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 3:09 pm
Teague (1989) and People v. [read post]
