Search for: "State v. Country" Results 4901 - 4920 of 26,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case arises from the defendants' public comments about Smartmatic and their claims that this company's software caused former President Trump to lose the 2020 election.The case is Smartmatic USA v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
The court stated that, without sufficient details, it was impossible for the court to determine if the plaintiffs had adequately stated a cause of action, or if the alleged fraud should be excused. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 9:00 am by zdr-admin
Due to recent legislative changes around the country following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am by Mary Anne Peck
But with the case hanging in the balance, and the Supreme Court’s decision last year overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm by Rosalind English
The determination of the secretary of state’s true purpose in making the deportation order was pivotal to assessing the lawfulness of the detention (R v Governor of Brixton Prison Ex p Soblen (No2) (1963) 2 QB 243 CA). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
The court begins its discussion by stating that “Transformation almost always occurs when the new work ‘does something more than repackage or republish the original copyrighted work. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
SCEs headquartered in post-communist countries and operating under a state-capitalism paradigm have increasingly gone global, investing in a wide range of economic sectors. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am by Peter Spiro
Not a single terrorist attack has been undertaken in the United States by any national of the seven listed countries. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Likewise, the law of other states of destination countries will also be engaged. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:56 pm
(The stay application is Stroup, et al., v. [read post]