Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4901 - 4920 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 11:23 am by Gene Quinn
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, decided SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
Before asking stakeholders whether and how this phrase should be defined, however, it seems to me that OPR should first thoroughly analyze CEQA’s legislative history to determine whether the Legislature ever intended it to broadly apply to non-state agency projects in the first place. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 3:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On September 9, 2015, the California Supreme Court denied review and decertified the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s previously published opinion in Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm by Ronald Mann
  Two years ago, the Court heard arguments in Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:50 am by Daniel De La Cruz
Employee’s Appeal Following the district court’s ruling, but before the appeal, the California Supreme Court announced its decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
The judicial disqualification case the Court will hear (Williams v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:26 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Similarly, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the EEOC’s pregnancy discrimination guidance in Young v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm by MBettman
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am by Jeff Welty
Besides changing the name of the condition, the bill seeks to conform the statute to the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Hall v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am by Jeff Welty
Besides changing the name of the condition, the bill seeks to conform the statute to the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Hall v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York . . . granted Bernardin's motion to dismiss, holding that Sewell's claims were time-barred under the CFAA's and SCA's applicable two-year statutes of limitations. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
 Given the Court's holding that the PAGA waiver is invalid, the Court remanded to the district court to determine whether the PAGA claims should be arbitrated or litigated in court. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Marina District Development Company, a New Jersey appellate court joins a long line of courts that simply refuse to see the illegal and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes. [read post]