Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
A number of depository institutions are completely exempt from the Student Loan Equity Act: state and federally chartered banks, credit unions, and Utah industrial banks. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:57 pm
Could this provision cause courts to revisit the willfulness standard discussed in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
Even more, the Court – similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky – recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm
When a patent holder sues a potential infringer, the question often comes up about what the patent holder can publicly say about the lawsuit, either to its customers or in press releases. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 10:24 am
§ 512(c)(3)(A)(v). [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 1999-C-1 v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:31 am
Even more, the Court – similarly as the Austrian Supreme Court in UPC Telekabel and the English High Court in Cartier v Sky – recognized that the availability of this remedy is compulsory under Art. 8(3) InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Attorney General Holder created the task force this year as part of his Defending Childhood initiative to prevent and reduce children’s exposure to violence as victims and witnesses. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
Earlier this week, the Second District Court of Appeal issued an interesting decision involving a mutual water company and the General Corporation Law, De Boni Corp. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:01 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Michael’s Constr. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
There were 251 Congresspersons who signed the pro-Second Amendment incorporation congressional amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:34 am
First, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 8:33 am
” State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
It allows the patent-holder to strongly imply they've been copied, even though most of the time there's no copying even being alleged. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:25 am
For a copy of the Supreme Court's decision in Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenant's Association v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
One of the privileges provided by trademark law is a trademark holder's right to prevent another's use of a mark that, while not confusingly similar in a direct way, nevertheless "dilutes" the trademark holder's registered trademark. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
(The only other majority opinion upholding a content-based speech restriction under strict scrutiny was Holder v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Billy Jack Holder v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 5:53 pm
v. [read post]