Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 4901 - 4920 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am by Lexero LLC
Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am by Admin
Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am by Admin
Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am by Lexero LLC
Stated another way, my client was sued by the “Embassy” of Libya. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:01 am
Express, Inc., 490 U.S. 477, 484 (1989)) (alteration marks omitted); see also State Oil Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 6:55 am
Progressives in the first third of the 20th century often emphasized federalism when they wished to resist federal judicial power to strike down state statutes (Brandeis' dissent in New State Ice Company v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
The product of Chief Justice John Marshall’s cryptic decision in Strawbridge v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 6:36 am
View the article here | State Recidivism Studies | Recidivism ArticlesTo determine sexual recidivism, it seems to me like you'd only want to consider other sexual crimes, not any crime, that skews the results, IMO.Recidivism Rates of Sex Offenders v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
LLC, 173 AD3d 1298, 1303 [3d Dept 2019] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 195 AD3d 1137, 1138-1139 [3d Dept 2021]). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
Therefore a proper allegation of nonuse should state that the marks were not in use as of those later dates. [read post]