Search for: "State v. So"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 117,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
This is an interesting attorneys' fees decision that says that New Yorkers who were able to force the state to allow them have a wedding ceremony at the height of the COVID-19 crisis cannot recover attorneys' fees because they technically were not prevailing parties -- even though the Northern District of New York granted them an injunction so they could proceed with the wedding.The case DiMartile v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:14 am
" Then, before listing the varying degrees of sexual assault that she says she experienced, Freborg states, "So here goes …. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
"FOIL imposes a broad duty on government agencies to make their records available to the public" citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm
For instance, in Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:20 pm
American Catalog Mailers Association v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:26 am
Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 11:05 am
by Dennis Crouch Elekta Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Porter , 415 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)] is fully informative for attorneys, carrier representatives, and those administering other state workers’ compensation act. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:58 am
From the EEOC's press release yesterday (and you can also read the Complaint, in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am
So by definition we have to work with our law enforcement partners, our civil partners like the CFTC, local law enforcements, as well as state regulators. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
In 2020, the Delaware Court of Chancery took its pro-shareholder stance to a new level in Woods v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 11:30 am
Given all of the above, all that remains is to follow the course of the case before the future actions of the IACHR, the defence of Polay Campos and the Peruvian State. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 10:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
S07623 is silent as to whether a private right of action would be specifically authorized, but does state that its provisions “shall not be construe [read post]
