Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 6,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 12:04 pm
In Gennifer Gee v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:46 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 4:07 am
., v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 11:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
V. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:56 am
So, the state of our educational system rests squarely on the deal makers in Tallahassee. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
How the PA workers’ comp insurer proves that a worker is undocumented or illegal, and not eligible for employment in Pennsylvania (or in the United States as a whole), was recently addressed by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Kennett Square Specialties v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 6:03 pm
His citation of Clark v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:43 am
Hohenberg et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:04 pm
In the AT&T v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
The Court reviewed the relatively recent United States Supreme Court decisions in the area, including Sereboff v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
To put it differently, if I were writing on a blank slate, I'd hold that there's federal Article III standing, but it nonetheless seems to me that such a position can't be reasonably squared with the Supreme Court's decision in Arizonans for Official Language v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
It’s hard to see how the individual mandate doesn't square with that view of the law, given how enormous the national health care market is. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Please address application packets to: Matthew Maddox Program Coordinator United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia Albert V. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:10 am
One’s account of the legality of international law cannot but square as a result with the inherent limitations of those two concepts. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:41 am
Thus, kill the medical monitoring class action and one largely kills the tort.We blogged not too long ago about the Third Circuit's decision in Gates v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
The question squarely presented in that grant is whether the Medicaid expansion that is part of the optimistically named "Affordable Care Act" is void because it is coercive, under the framework established by South Dakota v. [read post]
