Search for: "Strong v. United States" Results 4901 - 4920 of 6,643
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  For example, the small States’ ability to extract from the larger States a concession on equal suffrage in the Senate derived largely from the fact that the Confederation had established a negotiating baseline of equal State representation – a concession extracted more than a decade earlier. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
(no referendum held) Ireland is a members of the United Nations and legislatively ratified the United Nations Charter. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
 In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation, United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Case No. 4:10-MD-2186-BLW. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
  Register for Free Decisions this Week United StatesIndex Newspapers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Daniel Richardson
 The SCOV quotes favorably from a United States Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:29 pm
United States, when the Court considered whether to overrule Miranda. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
But unlike the UNGP, and like the Guiding Principles for Human Rights and the Environment, these would be directed to states directly (with a derivative obligation of states to discipline “their” enterprises—though this presumption is itself subject to strong reservation). [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
That is evident in this observation: “The CAVV takes the view that not recognising functional immunity for international crimes is currently justifiable as either being consistent with international law or contributing to a legal development that already has strong momentum. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am by Guest Blogger
But it’s not a good thing that no foreign-born person can be president of the United States. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  It recalled the extensive commentary by Justice Kennedy, in the Court’s last same-sex marriage decision (United States v. [read post]