Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 4901 - 4920 of 8,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9560, involves a defendant who came to the U.S. from the United Arab Emirates on a student visa. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 1:34 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
  “They will have to do without – aggravating the already serious problem of cultural education in the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 5:48 am by Shea Denning
The matter had, however, been considered by the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 9:39 pm
THE NATURAL READING OF SECTION 1964(c) WILL ENHANCE WISE LAW ENFORCEMENT To us, the dispute between Petitioners and Respondents presents a question of enforcing an important federal statute and, by analogy, its state law offspring. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
  If you are attempting to enter the Unites States or are already in the United States and you are inadmissible then you will be barred from receiving immigration benefits such as a visa or green card. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 7:42 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Consulate or Embassy, and subsequently enter the United States to begin working for the U.S. employer. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm by Suhre & Assoicates
Suhre & Associates, LLC – Dayton 130 West Second Street #17-129 Dayton, OH 45402 United States [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:51 am
Noonan at Patent Docs for recently posting his analyses of the 106-page draft report of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the Patent Reform Act of 2007 (S. 1145) which, under Section 5, would create a new post-grant review (PGR) system for United States patents, replacing and eliminating inter partes reexamination, in a new chapter 32 in title 35.According to the draft Senate Report,There are three ways to initiate a PGR proceeding. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Randolph thus reversed the district judge’s ruling ordering the release of the petitioners—seventeen Uighur refugees from China—into the United States when the government failed to justify their detention or resettle them elsewhere. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Immigration Opinions Barrett’s record on immigration is mixed, as she has ruled for the government in removing immigration petitioners and for immigration petitioners contesting their removal proceedings. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
In doing so, petitioners were operating on an erroneous premise. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Miriam Seifter
  (Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:35 am by Joel R. Brandes
While in Germany, Gabriela "said to the Competent Agency for Youth Services that she 'was not willing to return w[i]th the child to the United States.' " In an effort to bring about the return of his son to the United States, Keith filed Hague Convention proceedings in Germany through the United States Department of State. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:50 am by Ronald Mann
  After settling on a design for a fryer, Global-Tech obtained a patent opinion from its United States attorney indicating that the proposed fryer would not infringe any United States patents. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by crimdefense@hotmail.com
The conditions are as follows: Petitioner must be ‘‘in custody’’ when the petition is filed – “In custody” can include prison, parole, bond or other restraint resulting from the state court convictionViolation of constitutional law – The writ of habeas corpus must argue that the petitioner is “in custody” as a result of a violation of federal law or the Constitution of the United States.Exhaustion… [read post]
” Further, the EPA stated that the petitioner has not identified any language in any particular water quality standard that the petitioner believes to be vague or insufficiently clear. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:17 am by Sean Mirski
” In any case, the petitioner points to the case of United States v. [read post]