Search for: "US v. Love"
Results 4901 - 4920
of 9,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
If any experienced Ninth Circuit appellate lawyers can shed light on this, I’d love to hear it. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:59 pm
I confess that I don’t have a lot of patience for all of the very serious discussion people seem to be having about the case of Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
This Kat had no idea that use of "kiwi" might be a matter of cultural sensitivity, so he promises to be most careful how he uses it in future.A Katpat goes to Rhoda Baxter ("writer of smart romantic comedy" and author of Girl on the Run, originally released under its far more appealing title of Patently in Love) for pointing us to "Why Copyright Needs to Be Defended", a lively piece by Robert Levine that is sure to raise the… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
* Love the treatise,but what about those indices? [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:29 pm
Those of us on social media regularly see pictures posted couples and their dogs in which they are categorized as their “baby” or loved one. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:16 am
While the court case has continued, the Steve Irwin has been sailing the high seas disrupting illegal whaling. [1] Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2012] EWHC 1717 (Admlty) [2] Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2013] EWCA Civ 544 [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 4:08 pm
In 1932, Merck and its American counterpart ('MSD') struck a deal that MSD would have exclusive use of the word MERCK in the US and certain other countries, leaving Merck with the exclusive right to use the same word in more or less the rest of the world. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
One is Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information plc [2002] EWHC 1015 and [2002] EWHC 2772 (Ch) in which the late and much-loved Pumfrey J lamented the existence of "vanishingly small" damage in litigation that cost the parties a fortune and left them in pretty much the identical position to that before which they started suing (though a good deal the poorer). [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
In Mississippi, the district court in Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:44 pm
In Eads v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
| Who can use "Duke" as TM in the US? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
Goodrum v. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
Even in its most extreme, People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:46 pm
Brunswick Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 9:58 am
Later on they licensed their trade mark for use by Endemol UK Plc in a TV game show named -- guess what? [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:06 am
Susan Waters is a plaintiff in Waters v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
Horner and Peelle had many things in common, like their love of sports and fitness, and they became friends. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:51 am
Only under very exceptional circumstances it will use its discretion and not give such an order. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
