Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 4901 - 4920 of 7,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2020, 12:06 am by Florian Mueller
That's all the proposed amendment to the statute would do: it wouldn't even import anything into patent law any more than you couldn import the Statue of Liberty into the United States: what's already there can't be imported. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] CFIUS is a US government interagency committee that reviews certain transactions involving foreign investment in the United States to determine their effect on national security. [read post]
5 May 2009, 3:56 pm
On FRE’s part, the licence stated “we warrant for our part that the Housing Unit complies with all current legislation and is fully licensed as required to be used as residential property. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am by Jamison Koehler
United States (suppression of illegally obtained evidence), Crawford v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 3:33 pm by Jay Knispel
The United States Supreme Court explained the three legal elements of standing in the case of Lujan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Supporting this conclusion, the Tribunal referred to other legislative changes in jurisdictions like the United Kingdom, United States and the European Union, where transsexualism was considered a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am by Todd Buchwald
There is a fuller discussion in the report that Adam Keith and I produced for the United States Holocaust Museum. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  If she thought your travel was “not in the interest of the United States,” then you stayed home. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am by Will Baude
"  Another may examine the suggestion that even if Trump is constitutionally disqualified from being President of the United States, that does not mean he is constitutionally ineligible to be elected as President of the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
[¶] No actual corporate benefit has been stated and there is no evidence that proper judgment was exercised either. [read post]