Search for: "Wells v. State" Results 4901 - 4920 of 66,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2011, 8:49 am by Adam Baker
Other tender conditions of note were Condition 17, which stated that tender conditions “must be strictly complied with and failure to do so either in whole or in part may invalidate the bid in question” (para 38), as well as Condition 7, a privilege clause: The City reserves the right to reject any and all Tenders, and to waive any informality therein, to award by item or class. [read post]
The two Supreme Court cases that comprise the bedrock of legal precedent for the third-party doctrine—Smith v Maryland and United States v Miller—do not apply to cell site location data, the court found: We agree with the defendant…that the nature of cellular telephone technology and CSLI and the character of cellular telephone use in our current society render the third-party doctrine of Miller and Smith inapposite; the digital age has altered… [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 5:09 am
United States:For reasons well stated by Justice Scalia in his dissenting opinion in Smith, 508 U. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:21 pm
Neugebauer stated that the superiority of this type of proximity analysis was well-established. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:24 am
 In the decision of 9 July 2013 in BMS v Teva [2013] EWHC 1958, Mr Justice Birss assumed the role of the "remember when you..." parent in respect of Teva's launch plans. [read post]