Search for: "**u.s. v. Lowe" Results 4921 - 4940 of 5,318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 3:11 pm
Weissmann (Princeton, Columbia Law ‘84) says the problem is simple: that a 1909 Scotus decision, New York Central v U.S., has been misinterpreted. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:00 pm
” According to Petrocelli, the government’s entire case rested on the “honest services” theory of wire fraud that the Fifth Circuit subsequently rejected in U.S. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:50 am
Essentially, it involves increased support for social programs that will help poor women and families, under the reasoning that poor women without means are more likely to abort than women who are financially secure.Since Obama's election means that Roe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19]  This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20]  While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish just that. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:30 am
Supreme Court": At "The Am Law Daily" blog, Zach Lowe has a post that begins, "John Van De Kamp, a former Los Angeles district attorney and state Attorney General of California, walked into the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:09 pm
(Editor's Note: This post comes to us from Christian Leuz of the University of Chicago, NBER and ECGI, Karl V. [read post]