Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 4921 - 4940 of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
  In this way, the prohibition is not the only tool in the box but supplements other approaches. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am by Jelle Hoekstra
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 4:34 pm by Ken
Now I go all lawyery on your ass: See, e.g., Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), a cruel and unusual punishment case. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:26 am
 In 2013, the United States sought to obtain certain information about a target in a criminal investigation. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
Their comments are premised on the presumption that AHIs are caused by a malign state based capability being deliberately applied against American human targets in various overseas and domestic locations. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:20 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
New York State Department [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
The tweets included a post which stated: "I am in contempt of court, de facto if not de jure" and "Sucks that you can't tweet from the jury box. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
New York State Depa [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
Alexander Bobikin and Alexander Ivanov, who listened to the verdict standing in a reinforced glass box at the Kotelevska district court in central Ukraine, both pleaded ‘guilty’ last week. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:35 am
The tweets included a post which stated: "I am in contempt of court, de facto if not de jure" and "Sucks that you can't tweet from the jury box. [read post]