Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4921 - 4940 of 12,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Faced with the constant increasing number of transactions in the digital media market, the French government has decided to regulate and control online transactions in a general context where French regulatory bodies are (a) scrutinizing the use of user data for “intelligent advertisement”, (b) looking closely into the terms of use of digital platforms from a consumer protection and privacy prospective and (c) enforcing against these digital players. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:50 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Oppositions to the patent were filed by the company Intesa S.p.A (henceforth opponent O1) and, jointly, by the companies INFOCAMERE Soc. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Second, he argued that the best reading of 948a(7)(C) would connect personal jurisdiction to the existence of hostilities, notwithstanding the fact that the word is omitted in the section’s text. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
Ultimately, the two concluded that though technology companies would claim immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (47 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am by Gene Quinn
Transmirra Products Corp., and that the term "residence" in 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) means only the state in which a company is incorporated. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:24 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the employer’s petition did not meet the requirements of Section 9(c)(1)(B), the Board vacated a direction of an election and dismissed the petition. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:00 am by Dan Pinnington
Confirmation of completion of steps often required the transmission of paper, or that party A telephone party B, obtain an answer, and then make another phone call to party C to report the answer. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
21 May 2017, 10:00 pm
§ 1391(c)) to jurisdictions other than where the company is incorporated but anywhere it is subject to personal jurisdiction. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:35 pm by Jake Siegel
If all of the investors are accredited, then there is no difference between Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c). [read post]
20 May 2017, 7:19 am by Andrew Kent
The order by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointing Mueller states: (b) The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit noted that § 1453(c) is designed to provide a limited means, subject to strict timing controls on both the parties and the court, for appellate review of remand orders in cases removed under § 1453(b). [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm by Dan Pinnington
Almore Trading & Manufacturing Company Ltd., 2010 ONSC 3854 (CanLII). [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
 That statute, [Oregon Revised Statutes] 164.377(2), provides:`Any person commits computer crime who knowingly accesses, attempts to access or uses, or attempts to use, any computer, computer system, computer network or any part thereof for the purpose of:`a) Devising or executing any scheme or artifice to defraud;`(b) Obtaining money, property or services by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises; or`(c) Committing theft, including, but not… [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Advocate General Szpunar (AG) has delivered his judgement in the case C‑434/15 Asociación Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL. [read post]