Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 4921 - 4940 of 44,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The United States solicitor general represents the federal government before the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 2:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Stroud Township: The issue, as rephrased, is: Whether an ordinance that limits target shooting to two non-residential zoning districts, and thus does not provide for shooting ranges at all private residences, is facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution? [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:01 am by Ronald Mann
ShareThe justices took the easy and simple path in Siegel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:46 am
Each year, doctors, pharmacists and other providers administer hundreds of millions of vaccines to children and adults in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 11:53 am by Gene Takagi
Another likely reason for the increased use of section 501(c) organizations for political campaign activity is the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 2:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States, a Turkish bank asks the justices to review its claim for protection from criminal prosecution. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:59 am by Public Employment Law Press
Nor does the agreement demonstrate that the parties intended to arbitrate the claims of violation of wage provisions of the Labor Law asserted in the complaint (see Matter of Berger v New York University, __AD3d__, 2022 NY Slip Op 03313 [1st Dept 2022]; Hichez v United Jewish Council of the E. [read post]