Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 12,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2014, 11:22 am
The Supreme Court entertained the idea of an Art 6 and Art 1 Protocol 1 breach. [read post]
FDA sends warning letters to infant formula manufacturers, unveils Cronobacter history in facilities
31 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
Some of the significant violations are as follows: 1. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 7:01 am
” The EDPB does not elaborate as to what type of scenario falls under the second legal basis. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 7:47 pm
We discussed and analyzed the May 27, 2015 Draft Guidance and you can read our analysis here. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Brown’s lethal injection, has an expiration date of October 1, 2010. [read post]
Defamation Act 2013: A summary and overview six years on, Part 1, Sections 1 to 3 – Brett Wilson LLP
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm
In Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27 (see our blog here) it held that the meaning of section 1(1) is such that the question of whether serious harm has been suffered must be determined by reference to actual facts – the impact of the statement – not just the meaning of the words. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm
Two sub-questions follow: (1) how does that embedding shape the character of social credit ‘as’ or ‘in’ the cage of regulation through which the rule of law structures of Chinese constitutionalism are ordered; and (2) in what ways does the implementation of social credit through platforms change or displace traditional forms of the administration of law. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
Item 1 ofSchedule 1 [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:06 pm
That doesn’t sound very non-threatening to sovereignty, does it? [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm
These we can understand as the world perception (popularly even in English Weltanschauung) Ideologies or imaginaries or “lifeworlds”: the way that knowledge is organized and rationalized through systems of interpreting, understanding and giving meaning to the world around us (Sartre, Lacan[1]). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Moreover, the requirements for an admissible opposition are determined pursuant to A 99, R 76(2)(c), and R 77(1), whereas the effectiveness of a transfer of the opponent status is governed by the criteria developed in the established case law. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
”Here is what the Board had to say:Preliminary remarks[1] According to the European Patent Bulletin 2005/32 of 10 August 2005 and the decision of the opposition division of 27 November 2009, XIRING was the patent proprietor. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:53 am
Does 1-17*Exhibit G - RIAA surreply brief in Arista v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
What implications does this have on patients? [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
Pix Credit hereESG, has been driven by the private sector and intensely debated in the context of privately ordered responsible business conduct standards, and formed part of a rich debates among market actors and public international organizations about the role and nature of so-called non-financial siclosure in genmeral, and sustainability and climate related factors in decision making. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
The penalty does not prevent criminal prosecution in appropriate cases. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:10 am
" '458 patent col.1 ll.57-59 (emphases added); see also id. at col.5 ll.11, 17, 21, 24, 26, 27, 55, 58, 64, 65, 67, col.6 ll.1, 9 (interchangeably referring to the device identified by numeral 10 as "graft 10" and "intraluminal graft 10. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
A-1 installed the new roof. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
A-1 installed the new roof. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
There was no merit to plaintiff's claim that she would be deprived of her day in court in Israel because Israel does not provide for no fault divorce and defendant's consent to a divorce is required there. [read post]
