Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 4921 - 4940 of 5,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2008, 9:02 pm
Specifically, the changes in 37 CFR 1.78(f)(1) and (f)(2) will only apply to applications filed on or after any new effective date that would be published by the USPTO after the removal of the injunction. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 2:47 pm
Neiman, 1 F.3d  687, 689–91 (8th Cir. 1993), and section 1327(b) does not address assets acquired  after confirmation. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:45 pm
For example, the USA Today Preseason Top 25 Coaches Poll for Division I-A (FBS) (see digg) was published August 1, 2008. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
  Similarly, the court considered the sale of 37% of one defendant’s shares insufficiently large to trigger an adverse inference, noting that the Ninth Circuit “typically require[s] larger sales amounts . [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
But in his analysis, Judge Bates does reach at least three subsidiary questions that will have a substantial bearing on the privilege disputes (and remember that it will be Judge Bates himself who would adjudicate those disputes):1. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:38 pm
See 15 CFR 734.3(b)(1)(v) and 734.10(b) and 35 U.S.C. 184. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:20 pm
The Washington Post-ABC poll, where McCain holds an 8 point edge among whites, is interesting in that it shows a 37-24 Democratic edge in party ID, second only to being African American as an indicator of how voters will vote (note African Americans have been voting Dem by 9-1 for a long time, Obama pushes it up to 9.5-1). [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 7:42 am
From its relatively modest origin as confirmation that countries of the Berne Union are entitled to permit the reproduction of copyright works "in certain special cases, provided that such reproduction does not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and does not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the author",[1] the scope of this legal instrument has been steadily extended. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
Article 37 (1) (a) . . . to the extent necessary to benefit from the exception. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:15 am
Article 37 (1) (a) . . . to the extent necessary to benefit from the exception. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Accordingly, it was properly applied to the claims pending in this lawsuit.Id. at 37-38. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:41 pm by Adam J. White
-- effectively declared himself to be incapable of determining what the Constitution does and does not proscribe. [read post]