Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 4921 - 4940 of 16,011
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 10:34 am by Florian Mueller
In the Apple-Samsung context I wrote in a standard-essential Samsung v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, in a case like the 2002 SCOTUS decision in Verizon Md v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Rather, consistent with their punitive nature, punitive damages are akin to a fine exacted by the government . . . to deter and punish wrongdoers.Cheatham v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Rather, consistent with their punitive nature, punitive damages are akin to a fine exacted by the government . . . to deter and punish wrongdoers.Cheatham v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by CMS
In 2014, the European Commission (“the Commission”) found that Servier had contravened Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and imposed fines (Commission Decision of 9.7.2014). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 7:31 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
This means that one should put little stock in news flashes, articles and client alerts that claim that Loomis means that excessive fee claims are futile or that holding retail share classes is per se fine; rather, what Loomis means is that excessive fee claims are futile and that holding retail share classes is fine only if participants can find no additional aspect of the fee related decisions that falls below a fiduciary’s standard of care. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:42 pm
" That phrase came to mind when reading CGCCA's opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:53 pm by Robin
A rent repayment order is a form of ‘civil fine’ imposed on landlords who have broken the law. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:53 pm by Robin
A rent repayment order is a form of ‘civil fine’ imposed on landlords who have broken the law. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:23 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Cuando a la terminación de un año económico no se hubieren aprobado las asignaciones necesarias para los gastos ordinarios de funcionamiento del gobierno y para el pago de intereses y amortización de la deuda pública durante el siguiente año económico, continuarán rigiendo las partidas consignadas en las últimas leyes aprobadas para los mismos fines y propósitos, en todo lo que fueren aplicables, y el Gobernador… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm by David Jacobson
In Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 the Full Federal Court reduced Optus’ civil pecuniary penalties in relation to advertising for the ‘THINK BIGGER’ and ‘SUPERSONIC’ broadband internet plans from $5.26 million ordered originally (see here) to $3.61 million. [read post]