Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 37,548
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
In 1895, Congress sought to impose an income tax, but was stopped by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
In response to the violence, the government declared a state of emergency, which will last for 30 days. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am
Or do you have an affinity group for it? [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am
New Relist Andrus v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 9:59 am
ShareOn Monday, the court heard argument in Southwest Airlines Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 8:23 am
Saxon and LeDure v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
at *7 (quoting Goro v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:48 pm
In yesterday's National Press Photographers Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 10:35 am
Clark is the Chair of the Copyright, Entertainment, and Media Law Practice Group at McKee, Voorhees & Sease, PLC. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 8:42 am
The argument on Wednesday in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 7:38 am
From Judge Lee Rudofsky's opinion denying summary judgment, yesterday's Long v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
AAPC, United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:10 am
Circuit Court of Appeals explained in CREW v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:19 pm
NPPC v. [read post]
Justices add three new cases, including challenge to animal-welfare law and Warhol copyright dispute
28 Mar 2022, 10:49 am
Specifically, the states say, the rule outsourced decisions about what it means for reimbursement rates to be “actuarially sound,” as federal law requires, to a private group of actuaries. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
