Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 41,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2008, 12:33 am
House Okays Watered Down PRO IP Act June 1, 2008, World Law Media Patent Pools April 21, 2008, New York Law Journal Ninth Circuit Report: Krinsky v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
Gas Safety Eviction Case Landlords will be pleased to learn that leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal has. been granted in the case of Trecarrel House Limited v Rouncefield which we reported on here. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
Whittier v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:43 am
It permits a local authority to licence all landlords in a specific area where that area is one of low housing demand or anti-social behaviour, the local housing authority can show that there are problems which are in part due to poor housing management, and they can show that a licensing scheme will alleviate the problem. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:43 am
It permits a local authority to licence all landlords in a specific area where that area is one of low housing demand or anti-social behaviour, the local housing authority can show that there are problems which are in part due to poor housing management, and they can show that a licensing scheme will alleviate the problem. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am
The IEEE has gone as far as to suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:02 pm
However, regarding the programming issue, the debate of whether or not APIs can be copyrighted is a key issue in the Oracle v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:11 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:20 am
Southwark LBC v Barrett Bromley County Court 18/03/2011 A County Court Pinnock case. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:28 am
Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC (2009) CA (Civ Div) 15/12/2009 [only as Lawtel note so far] This was an appeal to the Court of Appeal from a s.202 appeal on the issue of what 'violence' in s.177(1) Housing Act 1996 meant. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:19 am
Mink v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:28 am
Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC (2009) CA (Civ Div) 15/12/2009 [only as Lawtel note so far] This was an appeal to the Court of Appeal from a s.202 appeal on the issue of what 'violence' in s.177(1) Housing Act 1996 meant. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 1:20 am
Southwark LBC v Barrett Bromley County Court 18/03/2011 A County Court Pinnock case. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:04 am
Alan McMillan, Linda Hepner v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:46 am
London Borough of Lewisham -v- Litchmore. 2 October 2009, Bromley County Court Since the beginning of replacement tenancies on May 2009, there have, rather surprisingly, not been any reports on cases involving the Housing and Regeneration Act 2008 Schedule 11 s.21 – when the new tenancy and the original tenancy are to be treated as the same and continuous for the purposes of a relevant claim (for breach of tenancy condition or statutory duty). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:50 am
[Ben Reeve Lewis considers innovation in housing …...] [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
Justice Karakatsanis referred to the Court’s decision in Canada (House of Commons) v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This also means that for these tenancies cases such as Church Commissioners v Meya, Macdonald v Fernandez, and Lower St Properties v Jones are also all irrelevant as they all deal with aspects of s21(4)(a) notices. [read post]
