Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 4921 - 4940 of 7,669
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
 (Kidding, Max, I’m just kidding… you know I kid… I’m a kidder.) [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:13 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Even if it’s a week-end, if it’s the first time I’m meeting with a client I will wear appropriate “lawyer clothes”. [read post]
16 May 2011, 3:07 am by John L. Welch
”The Board was particularly concerned with one legal issue: Section 2(a) bars the registration of a mark that "consists of or comprises … matter which may disparage … or bring ... into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:36 pm by Mark Bennett
King and Zedler, I’m not sure you should be using yourselves as corporal-punishment success stories, since you’re obviously highly stupid. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:36 pm by Courtney Minick
There is also the fact that not all opinions are available for free: only those marked for publication by the authoring judge. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:37 pm by StephanieWestAllen
“As a psychologist, I’m ashamed that it is physicists who are leading this effort, and not learning scientists. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:22 pm by Andrew Goldberg
Neuman:  I think if you look at everything in today’s terms, because there’s a scarcity of top-level domains, especially in the generic space, I think there’s certainly a belief by trademark owners that in order to adequately police their mark they’re going to have register at every top-level domain. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” One available video is called "I'm never drinking like that again" under the lead-in "Partied too hard last night? [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am by David Oscar Markus
(Bill)Subject: RE: OpportunitiesBiff: we've never met but you seem to be an ass who is extremely fond of himself.all the best,Mike HarrellFrom: Byrd F. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:42 am by SHG
  Whether judicial hotties or nasty lawyers, this is how Lat made his mark. [read post]