Search for: "Jones Act"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 7,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 12:00 am
Van Jones, JD, distinguished visiting fellow in the Center for African American Studies and in the Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University, will speak about “Beyond Green Jobs: The Next American Economy. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
The notion of such rights emerged as a result of the more horrific experiences of colonialism and imperialism (including cultural ethical imperialism), including the oppression of, and acts of genocide directed toward, indigenous groups and minority “nations” within nation-states. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:49 am
" The SG is right about that: A particular grand jury subpoena might conceivably impose such a substantial burden on a President’s discharge of his or her constitutional duties—just as a private lawsuit against the President for his pre-presidential acts might do so. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 pm
But Jones was unhappy with Yates, so he took the matter to the local U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
That argument had also failed in Jones v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:00 pm
The complaint that we filed on her behalf alleged ten (10) causes of action: As described by the Eleventh Circuit, the ten claims are: (1) a “Jones Act negligence” claim, alleging that Princess Cruise Lines breached its “duty to provide a safe place to work such that [Doe] could perform the job obligations in a reasonably safe manner and live aboard the vessel free from sexual violence and/or sexual harassment”; (2) an unseaworthiness claim,… [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:33 am
To learn more, read: The Jones Act vs. the Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act for Maritime Workers Work Injuries and On-the-Job Accidents in Indiana and Illinois With Federal Law Protections: FELA, Jones Act, LHWCA, DBA Illinois Workers Hurt in a Car Crash While Driving for Work: Legal Rights under Illinois Law Indiana Workers Injured in a Motor Vehicle Accident While Driving On the Job. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Under President Woodrow Wilson, the Jones-Shafroth Act (ch. 148, 39 Stat. 951) was enacted on March 2, 1917. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:20 pm
Thus, this new act of Congress changes nothing. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
For more, read: The Importance of Accident Site Location for Personal Injury Claims in Indiana and Illinois; The Jones Act vs. the Longshoreman and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act for Maritime Workers; and Work Injuries and On-the-Job Accidents in Indiana and Illinois With Federal Law Protections: FELA, Jones Act, LHWCA, DBA. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
The new law came into force with the repeal of section 13 of the Defamation Act 1996. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm
Nosal, the important Computer Fraud and Abuse Act case I have blogged a lot about, Oracle makes the following argument about interpreting “access” and “authorization” in the context of the CFAA. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:54 am
None of these rulemaking petitions have been acted on. [read post]
Supreme Court Declines to Enshrine the Independence of the Bar as a Principle of Fundamental Justice
13 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
Jones. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
What to Look For in the 2022 Proxy Season Posted by Blair Jones, Sarah Hartman, and Austin Vanbastelaer, Semler Brossy LLC, on Thursday, March 31, 2022 Tags: COVID-19, ESG, Executive Compensation, Human capital, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Say on pay, Shareholder voting The COVID-19 Pandemic’s Fleeting and Lasting Impact on Executive Compensation Posted by Mike Kesner, Linda Pappas, and… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Sure, perhaps the classic example of such an act. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Jones (1997). [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:50 am
The figures were revealed under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 7:05 pm
Jones, __ M.J. ___, No. 09-0271/AF (C.A.A.F. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
Davenport testified that the request for consent was necessary because the warrant `did not cover the acts of forcible sodomy or the physical sexual assault of the victim. [read post]
