Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS" Results 4921 - 4940 of 6,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 10:50 am by Steve Hall
Earlier coverage of the FDA lawsuit begins at the link; the civil law suit, Beaty v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Amy Howe
Davis (April 24): Whether ineffective assistance of counsel at the state post-conviction stage can overcome the failure to bring a substantial claim that an inmate’s appellate counsel was constitutionally ineffective. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Sixth Amendment Center, David Carroll surveys state practices relating to the use of non-lawyer judges in criminal cases, an issue presented in Davis v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
John Gibeaut and Wendy Davis provide substantial previews of Snyder v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Davis, in which the court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, lifted the death sentence of a Texas inmate whose defense expert had testified during sentencing that the defendant was more likely to be violent in the future because he is black, and Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
How BC’s Family Law System Puts Survivors in Danger (“Rise Report”). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987)(evidence of industry standards are inadmissible in strict products liability actions) Davis v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:44 pm by Venkat
Other State Law Claims: Plaintiffs asserted a slew of other state law claims, the bulk of which fell by the wayside. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
Aug. 29, 2008)(Jefferson)(insurance law, duty to defend, companion case to Zurich v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:44 am by Marshall Isaacs
Davis, 171 A.D.2d 192, 575 N.Y.S.2d 311 (1st Dep't 1992) (directing Supreme Court justice to rescind his part rule requiring judicial consent before the filing of a written motion); Goldheart Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The obvious danger from such claims is the effect on a jury when the plaintiff's counsel stands up and accuses your client of breaking the law - not just any law but the law overseen by the omniscient Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"); the law intended by Congress to keep us safe from adulterated drugs and misbranded medical devices. [read post]