Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:32 am
Around the same time, the United States produced a plat that identified the (northern-more) area east of Michigan Avenue as “public ground for ever to remain vacant of buildings. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 8:22 am
Meanwhile, one provision in the package that has drawn little attention so far could have significant implications for the United States Tax Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:42 am
See Abecassis v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
__X__ It does not concisely state all issues or points presented for review. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am
United States. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
This trend has included some pulling back from the near-per-se invalidation of discriminatory state laws under the Dormant Commerce Clause, most recently in United Haulers Ass’n v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:02 am
In addition, the United States seeks back pay, compensatory damages and reinstatement for Ms. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:39 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:48 am
United States from 1997. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
The Idaho Supreme Court, for example, stated in Bartosz v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm
Harvey Leroy Sossamon III is a prisoner in the Robertson Unit of Texas state prison system, in Abilene. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Government Drone Overflights May Violate Fourth Amendment, Trigger Exclusionary Rule
27 Mar 2021, 12:59 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court rejected the ancient understanding that land ownership extended upwards forever, landowners are still entitled to ownership of some airspace above their properties, such that intrusions into that airspace will constitute a trespass no different from an intrusion upon the land itself. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
United StatesPlessy v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
However, the Archivist of the United States certified the amendment as ratified under Article V of the Constitution, and published it in the federal register. [read post]
