Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am
Kane Jr. of United States District Court in Denver, who believes that prosecutors have grown more powerful than judges. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
” Finally, Joan Biskupic of the USA Today previews next week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 1:39 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:06 am
Maples v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:01 am
United States, No. 09-289 L (Oct. 25, 2011). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:04 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 pm
First, the FAA and Cape Wind Associates could appeal the decision by submitting a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
In Derrickson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Lyon Docket: 11-80 Issue: (1) Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’s participation in the litigation; and (2) whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
" Rondout Landing at the Strand, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm
The analogy to the deed is a good one because United States [patent] claims serve to define the outer limits or boundaries of the invention in the same fashion as the description of land in a deed defines the outer limits of the land monopoly. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
(Remember, The Grand Condominium v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
From the NY Times comes "Eminent Domain Fight Has a Canadian Twist," about a Canadian pipeline company's efforts to take land in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), this Court held that such adjudicative property exactions violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution as uncompensated takings unless an "essential nexus" exists between the property exaction and a legitimate state interest, and the property exaction is "roughly proportional" to the projected impact of the development. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
The changes further made the novelty defeating acts available wherever they occur in the world, thereby removing requirements related to occurrences in the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:54 pm
County of Oneida (disposession of tribal lands), United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
