Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 21,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2020, 4:48 pm
The plaintiff was later awarded attorney fees and litigation expenses, with the trial court holding the employer and its successor jointly and severally liable. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:54 pm
The defendant responded to her complaint by denying that it was liable and alleging that the plaintiff acted negligently and was, therefore, the primary cause of her injuries. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:13 am
So, what’s a tort? [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
Elizabeth's Hosp., 66 NY2d 684, "An employer cannot be held liable for an employee's discriminatory act unless the employer became a party to it by encouraging, condoning, or approving it. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
Elizabeth's Hosp., 66 NY2d 684, "An employer cannot be held liable for an employee's discriminatory act unless the employer became a party to it by encouraging, condoning, or approving it. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 8:30 am
Elizabeth's Hosp., 66 NY2d 684, "An employer cannot be held liable for an employee's discriminatory act unless the employer became a party to it by encouraging, condoning, or approving it. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:33 am
The tone was set at the top with the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Lorenzo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:31 am
” The Working Group’s report will address how the anti-corruption field can be further strengthened and aligned with the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” pillars of the UN Guiding Principles. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm
For example, a state supreme court recently held that a plaintiff was not entitled to relief when they tripped over a yellow speed bump in the defendant’s parking lot. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Historically, courts have only overruled a defendant’s summary judgment motion in talc asbestos cases when the plaintiff presented expert testimony on the issue of contamination and exposure. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:12 pm
Under this theory, plaintiffs must show that it was foreseeable that an injury would result because of the defendant’s actions. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:06 pm
Waivers typically favor the gym and serve to protect the gym’s financial interest and general reputation. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:12 pm
His discussion about the potential liabilities arising under the duty of oversight principles, as recently elaborated under the Delaware Supreme Court’s Marchand decision, is particularly helpful in showing the ways that individuals can be held liable under for their company’s antitrust violations. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:43 pm
The Third Circuit has explained that, “a supervisor may be personally liable under § 1983 if he or she participated in violating the plaintiff’s rights, directed others to violate them, or, as the person in charge, had knowledge of and acquiesced in his subordinates’ violations. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:59 am
” The Court noted that plaintiff’s own evidence showed that “the loose piece of wood was not visibly open and obvious,” and that “the evidence demonstrate[d] that Plaintiff had no knowledge of the dangerous condition, but neither did Defendants…” Essentially, plaintiff’s evidence regarding his own lack of knowledge of the dangerous condition also showed that defendants had no reason to be aware of the potentially… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
On the contrary, the average consumer would likely perceive the Big Horn products as cheaper or alternative versions of Red Bull’s products.Joint tortfeasorshipAs set out in Fish & Fish v Sea Shepherd [2015] UKSC 10, a defendant will be liable as a joint tortfeasor if: (i) the defendant has acted in a way that assisted the commission of the tort by the primary tortfeasor; and (ii) the defendant did so pursuant to a common design… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:49 am
Before the plaintiff’s case went to trial, the defendants successfully pursued a favorable judgment from the court on several of the plaintiff’s claims, citing previous Illinois appellate court opinions with similar allegations against the same defendants. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
Under Judiciary Law § 487, an attorney who “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party” is liable to the injured party for treble damages. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:14 am
The jury agreed to the extent that it found the defendant 67% at fault (while assigning 33% of the fault to plaintiff). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:00 am
So, the defendants won as a matter of law. [read post]
