Search for: "M. B.1." Results 4921 - 4940 of 13,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
Dutcher greeted Good and told him `I'm here to kill the President, the usurper, tomorrow at his speech. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:24 am by Nelson Tebbe
At root, that law prohibits the government from taking “discriminatory action” against religious actors that hold any of three enumerated religious or moral beliefs: a) that “[m]arriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman;” b) that “[s]exual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage;” or c) that “male (man) or female (woman) refer to an individual's immutable biological sex as objectively… [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:09 pm by Jarod Bona
I have also read many briefs, both practicing law and clerking for Judge James B. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:30 am by Daniel Shaviro
The answer is yes, given that the present value of one's tax liability from the account is zero, if we assume both (a) that the account just earns normal returns that the taxpayer can't scale up (a la Mark Zuckerberg hypothetically deciding to create two comparably profitable Facebooks rather than just one), and (b) that the taxpayer's marginal rate is the same at the contribution and withdrawal stages. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 6:53 am by Doug Cornelius
The instructions to Form ADV Part 1 Appendix B provide three steps on page 9: First, is the account a securities portfolio? [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 5:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Esbozó que el Artículo 1(b) de la Ley Núm. 115-1991, conocida como la “Ley de Acción por Represalia del Patrono”, definió patrono como “cualquier persona que tenga uno o más empleados” e “[i]ncluye a los agentes del patrono”. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 11:23 am by Herb Lin
(That would be interpretation (1).) [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:38 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
On point (b), many rogues I have dealt with are past masters at pleading poverty whilst owning numerous properties. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  41% said Pretzel Crisp was a brand, 41% said common name.Is it good enough if you exclude 1/3 of the people being tested? [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 5:57 am
No iPhone and no Google to make the correct answer obvious, b. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm
The respondents further relied on Section 14(1)(e), which provides protection for a well-known mark. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
But beyond that, I can’t tell you what the bill would do, and I’m not sure that anyone else can, either. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 8:32 am by Administrator
Requête en arrêt des procédures pour cause de délai déraisonnable en vertu des articles 11 b) et 24 (1) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. [read post]