Search for: "MATTER OF BROWN" Results 4921 - 4940 of 9,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 4:19 pm by Jon Gelman
(Chicago intellectual property attorney Evan Brown, who blogs about... [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Axel Arnbak
So yes, regardless of what some pundits may claim, it does matter what the NSA – and GCHQ for that matter – are doing. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Brown holds that the acts of the state legislature itself are absolutely immune from antitrust law, as a matter of statutory interpretation (but informed by federalism concerns). [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 6:18 am
In any event, I don’t think anybody has shown that Brown is wrong as a matter of original meaning. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, it’s not even clear that that is a federal question; it would appear to turn, instead, on matters of state corporation law--here, the laws of Pennsylvania (Conestoga Wood) and, perhaps, of Oklahoma (Hobby Lobby). 6. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:22 am by Nancy Leong
For those interested in the topic, I've begun reading Richard Maxwell Brown's Strain of Violence (thanks for the recommendation, Bruce Boyden!) [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am by Will Bland
Author informationWill BlandMember at Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand & BrackettAs a Member at Mouledoux, Bland, Legrand & Brackett, Will Bland regularly represents the interests of vessel operators, both brown water and offshore, oilfield operators, and their insurers in matters involving personal injury, collisions, sinkings, products liability, toxic torts, and contractual disputes. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:28 pm by Law Lady
 "Mayer Brown took a thrashing last week from a Manhattan judge who denied the firm’s $126,000 fee request for helping two tenants [ son of a corporate CEO who is a client of the law firm] recover a $6,400 security deposit and treble damages from their landlord. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 11:00 am
  As the Actoscourt and others before it got wrong, the admissibility of expert opinion testimony under Rule 702 and Daubert is a matter of procedure. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
The defense pointed out that since appointment of counsel on his behalf, Brown had made no statements to the press, his counsel had made no statements except with respect to matters in the public record, and any statements made by associates of Brown could not be attributed to Brown himself. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
The defense pointed out that since appointment of counsel on his behalf, Brown had made no statements to the press, his counsel had made no statements except with respect to matters in the public record, and any statements made by associates of Brown could not be attributed to Brown himself. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
The defense pointed out that since appointment of counsel on his behalf, Brown had made no statements to the press, his counsel had made no statements except with respect to matters in the public record, and any statements made by associates of Brown could not be attributed to Brown himself. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:59 am by Terry Hart
The Supreme Court a few weeks ago agreed to review the Second Circuit’s decision in ABC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:00 pm by Bryan Hawkins
 This ruling is in line with SB 292, which we blogged about shortly after it was signed into law by Governor Brown last August. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 2:00 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Bollea, 2014 WL 185217 (Fla.App. 2 Dist., January 17, 2014) Evan Brown is a Chicago attorney helping businesses and individuals identify and manage issues dealing with technology development, copyright, trademarks, software licensing and many other matters involving the internet and new media. [read post]