Search for: "MAY v. US " Results 4921 - 4940 of 120,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 10:47 pm by Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Arris Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:36 pm
Seattle fails as a ruling justified by what we may view as morally correct. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, the option to search for offers from private sellers is a tool that may be used for lawful purposes. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:35 am by Joe Mullin
US District Judge William Alsup, who oversaw the Oracle v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
Litigants may use either word, and we do not think our choice here will cause judges to “respond negatively” to litigants who use the term alien. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Robert Loeb, Emma Kohse
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 6:11 pm by Peter Tillers
Important Dates Research papers due: May 1, 2013 Position papers due: May 8, 2013 Accept/Reject notification for research papers: May 15, 2013 Preliminary Agenda posted: May 22, 2013 Camera-ready research papers due: May 22, 2013 ICAIL Conference: June 10-13, 2013 DESI V Workshop: June 14, 2013 Organizing Committee Jason R. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:20 am by Eleonora Rosati
A few days ago, the Music Publishers Association of Nigeria (MPAN) urged the NCC to reconsider the suspension of COSON’s licence as it has prevented copyright owners from earning royalties for the use of their works. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Michael Price
  Earlier this year, the Second Circuit waded into these waters when an en banc panel decided United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Karen Tani
Readers who have been following these posts may also be interested in the following call for submissions:The California Law Review welcomes you to submit a brief essay on the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:52 am by Jon Gelman
The US Supreme Court has invited The Solicitor General to comment on the the issue of Federal pre-emption of medical-device litigation. [read post]