Search for: "Mark May"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 63,787
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2013, 1:54 am
The Board observed once again that even sophisticated purchasers may be confused as to source when confronted by similar marks and legally identical goods.Considering all the relevant duPont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it affirmed the refusal. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:19 am
And the Board deemed the mark "highly descriptive." [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:06 am
The basis for the agreement as to lack of confusion was (not surprisingly) the differences between the marks and the goods. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 3:52 am
“Both direct and circumstantial evidence may show secondary meaning. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:30 am
He held, relying on a 1907 North Carolina Supreme Court decision, that "North Carolina common law protects corporations' trade names," stating that It is well settled that an exclusive right may be acquired in the name in which a business has been carried on, whether the name of a partnership or of an individual, and it will be protected against infringement by another who assumes it for the purpose of deception, or even when innocently used without right, to the detriment of another; and… [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
To those who are interested, you may want to move on anyway, given that this will only give you something else to worry about! [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
The hearing schedule and other details regarding attendance may be found at the TTAB website (lower right-hand corner). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:27 pm
"Accordingly, this case may be appropriate for a decision on an accelerated case resolution (ACR) record." [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 3:03 am
”The marks: The Board found that the marks at issue differed only in the highly descriptive or generic element – “silver” versus “diamonds. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:30 am
This “backlash” may happen also in cases where “David” is not a proper less powerful party. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 2:38 pm
Tomorrow, November 22, marks the 54th anniversary of President Kennedy's assassination in downtown Dallas, Texas. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 3:55 am
On other occasions it may make a ruling which makes good sense to traders or consumers but appears to violate the text or purport of the laws. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:59 pm
Someone who believes an applied-for mark is generic or descriptive may provide evidence supporting that belief to the PTO through the LOP process. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 12:52 pm
As such, it could not be used as a factor to determine how a sign may be perceived by the public as a whole. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm
If you are unable to do so, you may file a Request for an Extension of Time. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:23 am
"As to the marks, Opposer's L'OREAL PARIS mark is obviously identical to Applicant's mark. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:24 am
The PC recommended that the Government amend the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) to ensure that parallel imports of marked goods do not infringe an Australian registered trade mark when the marked good has been brought to market elsewhere by the owner/licensee of the mark. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:25 pm
In order to establish that a trade mark has acquired a distinctive character following the use that had been made of it within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Directive 2008/95/EC, is it sufficient for the applicant for registration to prove that at the relevant date a significant proportion of the relevant class of persons recognise the mark and associate it with the applicant's goods in the sense that, if they were to be asked who marketed goods bearing that mark, they… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:28 pm
See Bloomberg.com: NRA-Backed Law Spells Out When Indianans May Open Fire on Police by Mark Niquette. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:20 am
"While this mark may be disgusting, is it scandalous? [read post]
