Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:32 pm
Original Article 09/17/2010 By Marian V. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:01 pm
The Tenth Circuit relied upon the United States Supreme Court decision of Rucklehaus v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(Class 46) Reminiscences on ‘i Intel’ (Class 46) Portugal Portugal makes extra-budgetary contribution to WIPO capacity building projects (WIPO) Spain The Princess and the Trade Mark Office - High Court of Catalunya overturns SPTO refusal of Spanish trade mark applications for Letizia de Giorgi marks (Class 46) United Kingdom Professor Adrian Sterling’s orphan works scheme (IPKat) Movie industry: London… [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:41 pm
Parker was selected for her role as the lead prosecutor in the successful 2008 case of United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 pm
And you can access at this link the transcript of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 10:48 am
Merely descriptive marks will be refused on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm
The United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) allows trademarks to be registered on both the Principal and the Supplemental Register. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 2:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:02 am
" (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
Constitution's Supremacy Clause, "the laws of the United States . . . shall be the supreme law of the land . . . the law of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:10 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
Mark Dean Schwab v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 10:03 am
United States Another grant may be on the way for this Confrontation Clause petition, with 54.1% of teams forecasting that outcome and only 32.4% expecting the Court to deny cert. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
Prior to launch of Lecaent in the United Kingdom the First, Second and Third Defendants and each of them shall ensure that each pack of Lecaent supplied to a pharmacist is accompanied by removable notification that is easily legible stating:'This product is not authorised for the treatment of pain and must not be dispensed for such purposes.'5. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:29 am
United States is a case about the classification of used clothing coming into the United States.The plaintiff imported bales of used clothing and classified the merchandise in HTSUS item 6309.00.00 as "worn clothing," which is a duty free. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
., United States District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina and Kathy Clements, The Vanishing Criminal Jury Trial: From Trial Judges to Sentencing Judge, 86 GEO. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 10:36 am
” United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Khan v. [read post]
