Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
McLean & V. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:48 am
In paragraph 27 of Bastien Estate, Cromwell J. stated: [27] . . . [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:48 am
In one of the case laws analyzed by the DHC (Birch Shipping Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:56 pm
For more, read my More Words Mean Less -- Ava Acupuncture v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
” Even if the question could not be answered by the Secretary of State in every case, “at least the attempt had to be made” (para. 138). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am
Mentioned is also the English case O v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
If the judgment’s holding is valid then it would render illegitimate many other restrictions which are currently unspecified in this regard including those applicable to crime and taxation here in the UK (DPA 2018, Sch 2, para 2) as well as potentially many others in EU States such as Ireland and Netherlands (see here at pp. 795-96). [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Neither decision refereed to the Homeless Code of Guidance para 17.40, which states that accommodation should not be considered affordable if residual income (after costs of accommodation) would be less that the level of income support (or income based jobseekers) applicable or that would be applicable if entitled to claim it. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 710 (21 June 2011) ?? [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Neither decision refereed to the Homeless Code of Guidance para 17.40, which states that accommodation should not be considered affordable if residual income (after costs of accommodation) would be less that the level of income support (or income based jobseekers) applicable or that would be applicable if entitled to claim it. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am
As Lord Mance pointed out in Doherty v Birmingham [2009] 1 AC 367, para 126, section 2 of the HRA requires our courts to “take into account” EurCtHR decisions, not necessarily to follow them. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 6:05 am
This is a mess of CLS Bank v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Essentially Craig v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:52 am
Second, it would appear doubtful that a paywall is strictly speaking a TPM, as stated at paragraph 31. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:09 am
As for the notion of ‘territory’, it was recalled that it may include geographical areas which, although under the jurisdiction or responsibility of a different State, have a separate and distinct status under international law (Court of Justice, Council v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
Conclusions at para 249: “importance of preserving life is decisive factor in case” BAH v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
State and State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:56 pm
The situation since 1989 may require us to make changes to the scheme of the Election Commission, but that does not necessarily point to a flaw in the Constitution.The drafting history of current Article 324 is concisely covered in Justice Sawant's judgment in the Dhanoa case (SS Dhanoa v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:10 pm
Today, in Berkheimer v. [read post]
