Search for: "People v. Render" Results 4921 - 4940 of 5,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
McKenzie, No. 07-1834 Sentence of forty-two months' imprisonment for distribution of cocaine base is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) district court incorrectly assigned two points to her Criminal History Category (CHC) score, thus rendering her ineligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(f); and 2) district court improperly credited computerized docket reports showing her past convictions. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
  Kwiatkowski told few people at work that he was gay, but he believed that many people knew. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 1:29 am
Lynch, the First Circuit issued its opinion in New Jersey Carpenters Pension & Annuity Fund v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and CEOs: If your… [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Georgia (1972) 408 U.S. 238, until rendered moot by the California Supreme Court decision in People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:02 am
  I think not, as he uses his point to question the Supreme Court's Scott v. [read post]