Search for: "People v. Sole"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 6,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The courts must be partners with their users, including those without representation, to help them solve the puzzle of legal processes, to enable them to meaningfully participate (to paraphrase the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pintea v Johns). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:02 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:15 am
The trade must be in the security of a single issuer and the purchaser must not have been created or used solely to purchase securities in reliance on the exemption. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:44 am
’” In a solo dissent, Thomas criticized what he characterized as the majority’s “surprising and misplaced reliance on New York Times v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:21 pm
What would they do if I incorrectly cited Anders v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:31 pm
Some lawyer working on something entirely different might at some point need to know about Schmoe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 8:29 am
In Orr v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:23 am
” Granting summary judgment on this claim, the court noted that it was based solely on the audio recording of comments he made during a “staff meeting” involving at least four people. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:07 pm
See, e.g., Kremen v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Take, for instance, the recent Ontario case, B. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm
How do the NetChoice cases relate to Murthy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
It’s not solely Mr. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:02 am
One year later, the Supreme Court decided Mazars v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:24 am
joint v. sole? [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
joint v. sole? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
High Sierra Rural Alliance v. [read post]
