Search for: "People v. White"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 6,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
That includes United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:58 am
Stites, a white woman. [read post]
19 May 2023, 10:21 am
On Wednesday, the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
Providing separate drinking fountains for blacks and whites and relegating black restaurant patrons to take-out windows, with sit-down service reserved for whites, convey clear messages of racial degradation. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:49 am
Georgiou says his conviction was tainted by violations of Brady v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 4:54 am
Given the steep requirements of Article V, (1) is virtually impossible. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 11:42 am
According to the case Masquerade Novellty v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:35 am
This is in line with the case of White v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
“We’ve been urging the White House, DOE [Department of Education] and Congress to persuade lenders to create the suspended payment period. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:18 pm
Gorsuch sets out much of that history in his lengthy concurring opinion in Haaland v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 5:47 am
And what if anything means everything to the people? [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am
The issue could return to the Supreme Court; the Court’s prior ruling in the Virginia case, Williams v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 7:42 pm
President's Commission on White House Fellowships .. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
In Florida v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:23 pm
This week in Ashcroft v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:17 am
Cal.) in Weiss v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:16 pm
From Amin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 11:05 am
The generation that adopted the Fourteenth Amendment nevertheless expected that states could ban whites and blacks from marrying each other. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am
One state court held (by a 5–4 vote) that those statutes themselves violate the First Amendment when applied to newspaper reporters or editors.[7] But in AP v. [read post]
