Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE" Results 4921 - 4940 of 6,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2010, 10:27 pm by Michael DelSignore
Summer, 452 U.S. 692 (1981), decided by the United States Supreme Court the court addressed the issue of when an individual can be seized prior to executing a search warrant. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Adam Wagner
In summer 2008, the Ministry of Defence announced that soldiers could wear their military uniform at gay pride festivals. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 12:58 pm
(photo credit) In the trial of Prosecutor v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm by Michael Geist
  In reviewing copying practices in the law library of the Law Society of Upper Canada, the court stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Lindsey Williams
  The actual differences of opinion on S. 372 developed in the summer of 2009. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
This post describes results from a survey conducted by Stephen Ansolabehere and myself last summer, which included a question about Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 12:35 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Yesterday, the Supreme Court revisited this issue in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Indeed, the first half of the lengthy argument session was taken up with the issue of whether anyone had “standing” to appeal the ruling last summer by U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Employee claims termination was in retaliation and that her employer defamed herEmployee claims termination was in retaliation and that her employer defamed herGilligan v Town of Moreau, CA2, 2000 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am by Kara OBrien
Based on this schedule, which was approved by the court, it is possible that oral arguments could be held in early spring 2011, and the court could be in a position to issue a decision in the case by summer 2011. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:50 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Rodger sought to emphasise the reasoning of Lord Phillips, stating that “ordinary crimes” are not protected by privilege. [read post]