Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
Code §1349 - Attempt and conspiracyUnited States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
Code §1349 - Attempt and conspiracyUnited States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
Code §1349 - Attempt and conspiracyUnited States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 10:14 am
Yet the Court was careful in Belton to distinguish United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
They have one child together, M.D., who was born in June 2008 in California and is a United States citizen. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am
The United States Supreme Court, in cases such as Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
For example, volume 2 includes The United States and International Law: From the Transcontinental Treaty to the League of Nations Covenant, 1819-1919, by Eileen P. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:12 am
I’m writing about it again now, because the story just keeps getting worse, and it’s reached the point where it’s become constitutionally offensive, and should be horrifying to every citizen of these United States, and certainly to every resident of Orange County, California. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:46 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:50 pm
Although my discussion makes use of California and Ninth Circuit law, its substance will undoubtedly apply, mutatis mutandis, to any jurisdiction in the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
” Soon thereafter, in June 2022, five automakers—Ford, Volkswagen, BMW, Volvo, and Honda—backed the EPA’s grant of a statutory waiver to California so that the state could set more stringent emissions standards to be followed by a group of other states. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 5:02 am
’ State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
OFSTEDAHL, ET AL., United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Civil Action No. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 12:27 pm
LEXIS 62323, the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that an initiative ordinance in Kern County approved by the voters which had the effect of banning the land application of biosolids was unconstitutional. [read post]
