Search for: "State v. Mars"
Results 4921 - 4940
of 4,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
In response to an inquiry about wellness program that gave non-smoking employees substantial reductions on the health insurance premiums, the E.E.O.C. stated, "It could be argued that providing a monetary incentive to successfully participate renders the program involuntary because the size of the payment must be considered. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 3:08 am
But in Case T-88/05 Quelle v OHIM - Nars Cosmetics (NARS) the Mars in question was anything but edible. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:16 am
In Voda, M.D. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Mar. 30, 2000); Harris v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:35 pm
Mar. 30, 2006) (information republisher not liable for offline harassing behavior made using published data); Barnes v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:49 am
Mar. 23, 2006). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 1:09 pm
Also, in real life, we have a termination of a Mars employee, who tested an invention at work, but who would not assign the independently-created invention to Mars.From Omissions and Commissions: Durel v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 7:15 pm
Parker v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Loses Critical Battle in GWOT (Mar. 14, 2006)11. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:56 am
"The Washington Post has "Victim Images Did Not Mar Trial, Justices Rule. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
Miles was decided, the Court held in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
In other Public Defender news, the 9th Circuit blog has a post entitled "Gonzales: DOJ agrees Ninth Circuit precedent on minor offenses is flawed" and that the Department of Justice has conceded that the Ninth Circuit should grant rehearing en banc to correct United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 8:45 am
In the Supreme Court November 29: Watters v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
The Framework states, among others, that the CBE will adopt a position of neutrality during an organizing campaign; post a notice to its employees advising them of its neutral position; grant the Union access to its premises to distribute information and to meet with employees; furnish the Union with employee names and addresses; and recognize the Union based on a majority showing after a card check. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 2:03 pm
The Constitution protects the right to associate with others for the “vigorous advocacy” of “lawful ends” (NAACP v. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
Mar 30, 2006) (NO. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:58 pm
UK Registry to warn TM owners of dangers of conflictThe IPKat recently received a note from Guy Heath (Nabarro Nathanson) on the current state of play with regard to trade mark oppositions in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 May 2006, 7:53 pm
The court held in a 1979 case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2005, 1:39 pm
According to the present technological state of the art, such a patina cannot be created artificially. [read post]
